HomeDaily PostSupreme Court Rebukes Delhi Over Air Pollution, Questions Inconsistent Crackers Ban

Supreme Court Rebukes Delhi Over Air Pollution, Questions Inconsistent Crackers Ban

11 November, 2024; The Supreme Court recently raised concerns about Delhi’s persistent air pollution, emphasizing that sporadic measures around festivals like Diwali have failed to address the capital’s worsening air quality. The Court questioned why firecrackers are only restricted during certain festivals and urged the government to consider a year-round ban. Highlighting the severe environmental and health impact of firecrackers, the Court emphasized the need for consistent, stringent action to reduce pollution and protect public health.

Supreme Court’s Stand on Firecrackers

In its remarks, the Court highlighted the apparent inconsistency in enforcing firecracker bans only during specific religious celebrations like Diwali, urging the government to implement a year-round restriction. This would not only help mitigate pollution during the winter months, when air quality often reaches hazardous levels, but also curb pollution levels overall.

The Court observed that the occasional restriction on firecrackers has been insufficient, given the year-round pollution crisis in Delhi and neighboring regions. Pointing out the discrepancy in bans enforced only on Diwali, the Court asked why similar restrictions are not applied during other celebrations and social gatherings. This selective approach, the Court suggested, might hinder efforts to achieve lasting improvement in air quality.

Health and Environmental Impacts of Firecrackers

Firecrackers release harmful particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) and toxins like sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, which aggravate respiratory conditions, particularly in vulnerable groups like children and the elderly. During winter, when air is already heavy with pollutants, adding firecracker emissions worsens the “air quality emergency,” causing severe health issues for Delhi’s residents. Studies have linked exposure to these pollutants with increased rates of respiratory diseases, heart problems, and premature mortality.

The Need for Consistent Policy and Awareness

The Court called for the government to take concrete steps to address air pollution consistently rather than temporarily. The bench suggested that a nationwide ban on firecrackers could be an essential measure to curb pollution, asking authorities to collaborate with local bodies, environmental agencies, and experts to develop sustainable policies. It also emphasized the need for public awareness campaigns to sensitize citizens to the health hazards posed by firecrackers and the importance of reducing pollution for the well-being of future generations.

Towards a Green Alternative?

Some states have been experimenting with green crackers, which release fewer pollutants compared to traditional fireworks. The Court recommended exploring eco-friendly alternatives as a potential compromise, allowing citizens to celebrate in ways that do not harm the environment. Green crackers, certified by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), release 30% less particulate matter, though their efficacy and affordability remain debated.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s call for a comprehensive, year-round approach to the firecracker issue underscores the urgent need for a unified, consistent policy. Air pollution remains a critical problem in India, with Delhi frequently ranking as one of the world’s most polluted cities. The Court’s suggestion to extend the firecracker ban beyond Diwali points to a necessary shift in tackling pollution as a national, year-round priority.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

spot_img