New Delhi, May 28, 2024 — The Supreme Court has dealt a significant blow to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in connection with the ongoing Delhi liquor policy scam case. Kejriwal’s legal team, led by renowned lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi, had submitted a petition seeking a seven-day extension of his interim bail. The request was urgently presented before the Supreme Court, with Singhvi urging for an expedited hearing.
However, the Supreme Court has dismissed the petition, refusing to grant the requested extension. This decision comes as a setback for Kejriwal, who has been embroiled in the controversy surrounding the Delhi government’s liquor policy. The case, which has attracted significant media attention and political scrutiny, centers on allegations of corruption and irregularities in the formulation and implementation of the policy.
Background of the Case
The Delhi liquor policy scam involves allegations that the Delhi government’s policy was designed to favor certain private companies, leading to substantial financial gains for a select few at the expense of public revenue. The policy, introduced under the Kejriwal administration, aimed to overhaul the city’s liquor trade by allowing private players greater control and reducing government monopoly.
Critics argue that the policy was manipulated to benefit specific businesses, with claims of bribery and kickbacks surfacing during the investigation. These allegations have prompted a series of legal battles, with the central government and opposition parties calling for accountability and stringent action against those involved.
Legal Proceedings
In light of these allegations, Kejriwal, along with several other officials and businesspersons, has faced intense legal scrutiny. The Chief Minister had been granted interim bail, providing temporary relief amid the ongoing investigation. However, as the period of this interim bail neared its end, Kejriwal’s legal counsel sought an extension to ensure his continued release.
Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing Kejriwal, approached the Supreme Court with an urgent petition. Singhvi highlighted the need for additional time, citing the complexity of the case and the requirement for a thorough defense preparation. He requested that the matter be listed for an urgent hearing, emphasizing the significance of the extension for Kejriwal’s legal strategy.
Supreme Court’s Decision
Despite the arguments presented by Singhvi, the Supreme Court declined the petition for an extension of interim bail. The Court’s decision implies that Kejriwal must now either seek alternate legal recourse or face potential arrest as the interim bail period concludes. The refusal to extend bail underscores the judiciary’s firm stance on handling cases involving high-profile individuals and serious allegations of corruption.
Political Implications
The Supreme Court’s rejection of Kejriwal’s plea is likely to have substantial political repercussions. As the head of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the Chief Minister of Delhi, Kejriwal’s involvement in the liquor policy scam has already impacted his political standing. The ongoing legal challenges and the recent setback in the Supreme Court could further erode public confidence in his leadership and the integrity of his administration.
Opposition parties are expected to seize upon this development, intensifying their criticism and calls for Kejriwal’s resignation. The BJP and Congress, in particular, have been vocal opponents of the AAP government’s policies and are likely to use this opportunity to press for greater accountability and transparency.
